"Have you ever considered this issue? You probably know that XDC Network addresses are EVM-compatible. So, if a user from another EVM chain interacts with the XDC Network using a 0x address through MetaMask or similar platforms, there shouldn’t be any problems. However, if a person who holds assets on the XDC Network with that address decides to use D’Cent Wallet, and creates an account with the existing seed phrase, D’Cent Wallet will generate an XDC address that is different from the original 0x address, even though the seed phrase is the same. This situation creates inconvenience.
2 Likes
I can see the inconvenience from both the user and the developer. Usually, devs use MM because its easier to use when deploying contracts on remix (XinFin or ETH). All RPC’s recognize both ) 0x and XDC so it’s mostly on the devs of the wallets to introduced something that allows the user to choose XDC header or 0x header on the address format. I am aware that Tangem wallet has this feature, and other wallets should follow suit as well. With this statement Im not saying “it’s not our problem”. What I’m saying is that we do recognize this issue but it’s something that’s easily overcome. We will contact wallet providers and ask if they can introduce that feature. For XDCPay wallet, with the introduction of 0x to the RPC’s, wallets will be next. Thank you for bringing this up.
4 Likes